11 ms·
Some trees and plants that are still rebellious about this: https://www.ornamental-trees.co.uk/images/cercis-canadensis-merlot-p1128-7419_image.jpg https://www
by raxxorrax 6y ago
Some trees and plants that are still rebellious about this:
https://www.ornamental-trees.co.uk/images/cercis-canadensis-merlot-p1128-7419_image.jpg https://www.ornamental-trees.co.uk/images/cercis-canadensis-...
Of course those also have chlorophyll, but the color is overridden by other color particles.
Sadly we have no blue trees. We have blue flowers though and it would probably be possible to create one. That would be so awesome.
- MarkSweep 6y agoA blue spruce is a fairly blue tree: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_spruce https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_spruce
- bregma 6y agoBlue spruce is actually pretty darn green, but its needs have a waxy coating that alters our perception of the colour of the underlying tissue. New needles, and needles you scrape with your fingernails, reveal their true green colour. A waxy coating is a strong selector for survival in an environment where preventing evaporation is a must, such as locations in which the ambient temperature drops below the freezing point of water for much of the year.
- SECProto 6y agoDo black spruce have a waxy coating? They certainly don't appear blue, and they thrive in locations with much colder winters than the blue spruce.
- piva00 6y agoAs far as I know all coniferous (Pinophyta) have waxy coatings, black spruces are a species of Pinophyta so I'd assume they do. I might be wrong, I'm no botanist.
- dTal 6y agoIsn't that a little like saying that a shiny red sports car is actually metallic gray, but it has a coating that alters our perception of it so that it appears red to our eyes? Color is what we perceive, nothing else. If it looks blue, it is blue.
- Avamander 6y agoWell, if you look the world through blue-tinted windows it doesn't make the world suddenly bluer though. I think the same kind-of applies here.
- TwelveNights 6y agoI think in this case the wax lining on the pines would be moreso a property of the object rather than the apparatus through which we see the object.
- yndoendo 6y agoIs not the category of it Photosynthesis? Internally the environment of Blue spruce is the evolutionary standard of Green, not Blue. The blue perception would also reflect a Blue perception of photosynthesis standard.
- bregma 6y agoIt's more like saying that the steel your shiny red sports car is made of is actually metallic grey even though it has a veneer of red enamel on it.
- sgt101 6y agoInterestingly, when organisms retain this kind of diversity it is because of the evolutionary advantage that it confers. In this case that would be the ability of plants in general to evolve towards other colors. For this to be an advantage the driver for that would have to be present in our long term environment. Possibly some sort of moderator appears in the atmosphere? Or does the spectra of the sun change due to some process?
- learnstats2 6y agoI think trying to identify evolutionary motivation is generally risky and subject to all kinds of human biases. Any hypothesis is unfalsifiable (so, it's speculation, not science). Having said that, "Green = provides a convenient way for animals to identify a great source of energy" is likely to be one driver here.
- raxxorrax 6y agoPerhaps the sun isn't the reason. I believe some plants hide from certain kind of predators by changing their colors or maybe they could draw certain insects or birds for additional pollination. Perhaps that was a more significant advantage.
- Shivetya 6y agoFor color variety, depending on yard location, I have a variation of Loropetalum, one Lilac, and a Japanese Maple. Had a pair of plum trees but the ornamental variety you can buy tends to not last as long. For low ground stuff Nandina can offer greens, reds, and yellows, in good variety.
- mutatio 6y agoIsn't that a cultivar though, artificially maintained in horticulture. Does it occur in significant numbers in wild populations?
- tipoftheiceberg 6y agoThe only blue flowers we have are dyed. We do not know of any “true blue” plant pigments. There are violets and many colors that might look close..
- eggsnbacon1 6y agoI have seen many blue flowers personally but since this is a trustworthy internet forum I believe you
- tipoftheiceberg 6y agoFwiw, I hold a degree in Horticulture. A good source is David Lee, author of Nature's Palette: The Science of Plant Color and a retired professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at Florida International University in Miami.
- vilhelm_s 6y agoMaybe there's some kind of definition that make this make sense? On the face of it it seems very weird to claim that "this is actually a red pigment, it just looks blue". Why not say that it's a blue pigment which looks red in certain pH conditions?
- tipoftheiceberg 6y agohttps://sciences.adelaide.edu.au/news/list/2019/08/20/why-is-the-colour-blue-so-rare-in-nature https://sciences.adelaide.edu.au/news/list/2019/08/20/why-is...
- vilhelm_s 6y agoThe article seems nonsensical in the same way, though. > For plants, blue is achieved by mixing naturally occurring pigments, very much as an artist would mix colours. The most commonly used are the red pigments, called anthocyanins, and whose appearance can be changed by varying acidity. It's just saying the same thing, "a red pigment appearing blue", without any explanation. (Also, as artists know, blue and red are primary colors, you can't get blue by mixing red paints.)