4 ms·
> This was how his downvotes looked early this morning: https://imgur.com/a/GuTffzP https://imgur.com/a/GuTffzP Judging from your screenshot I'd say that comme
by oefrha 6y ago
> This was how his downvotes looked early this morning: https://imgur.com/a/GuTffzP https://imgur.com/a/GuTffzP
Judging from your screenshot I'd say that comment was styled as .commtext.c5a:
.c5a, .c5a a:link, .c5a a:visited { color:#5a5a5a; }
It only takes one net downvote to get there. Even one fat finger could flip that, and I fat finger on mobile a lot.
Anyway, discussions on downvotes are boring and guidelines-breaking, and even worse when it's misinformation, as a single comment could only contribute -4.
I've emailed the mods to detach this thread.
Edit: And... this comment has promptly contributed -4 within ten minutes. I don't really give a crap since I've got enough points to withstand a scratch like this. But the irony of being heavily downvoted for correcting misinformation on a thread supposedly correcting misinformation...
- jayrice257 6y agoMore like your garbage post got downvoted for good reason and you're defending it with "how ironic". It's actually not at all ironic and no one cares you sent this to a mod