4 ms·
I did this (unkowingly) with photography equipment. Didn't work out. 1. I started with a "nice" bridge camera - the Panasonic Lumix LX100. I liked shooting wit
by loxs 6y ago
I did this (unkowingly) with photography equipment. Didn't work out.
1. I started with a "nice" bridge camera - the Panasonic Lumix LX100. I liked shooting with it but I quickly hit its limitations and because I loved photography...
2. decided to go full-frame and I bought the Canon EOS RP. Now I'm completely overwhelmed with all the gear, the huge lenses, tripods etc. I definitely shoot less than with the Lumix, as now shooting requires much more ritual and forethought.
In hindsight I should have bought a Micro Four-Thirds interchangeable lens camera, as I was absolutely content with the quality of the Lumix, just wanted a "faster" system with better controls.
- CarbyAu 6y agoI followed much the same path as you. And then I did buy the Micro Four Thirds camera for an overseas holiday. It was better enough to satisfy my craving for manual settings and RAW output. But it was bulky enough for it to be a decision "to take it" anywhere and expensive enough not to leave in the glovebox/bag/convenient-nearby-place. Ok compromise for travelling for the DLSR types but maybe the fullframe sony rx1 would've been better. But wife can pick up almost any camera and instantly make a much better picture than me. I suck at composition. Or I am biased towards my wife. Who knows. Either way, I ditched it all and now just use the smartphone(Open Camera), but try to get better at composition...