4 ms·
> But any detailed look seems to show each reason step as both implausible and "weird", senseless. Trouble here is that we're having this discussion in one of
by theelous3 6y ago
> But any detailed look seems to show each reason step as both implausible and "weird", senseless.
Trouble here is that we're having this discussion in one of the most unusually concerned-with-logic spaces on the web. Your average facebook user isn't doing a detailed analysis of logical steps in a theory. They see something say "wind power bad" and that's that. Wind power bad.
- joe_the_user 6y agoIf you read my whole comment, yes, trolls are indeed just "wind power bad" and you don't need GPT-3 for that. You've had that forever. GPT-3 has this quality that yes, it's very impressive but much less useful for a purpose than such impressiveness suggests. Like much of current AI, imo. Certainly there are exception, valuable uses, but still.
- theelous3 6y agoNobody says you need it, just that it can make the prevalence of more sophisticated WindPowerBad bots much worse.