3 ms·
> you could treat 64 or 80 bits as secure You're confusing statistically uniform with cryptanalytically secure. By that logic you can 'debunk' plain old hash t
by a1369209993 6y ago
> you could treat 64 or 80 bits as secure
You're confusing statistically uniform with cryptanalytically secure. By that logic you can 'debunk' plain old hash tables because someone might feed you keys that all hash to the same slot.
- Dylan16807 6y agoWhat's wrong with saying that? It's a real vulnerability if you don't have a secret seed.