5 ms·
If the bill still claims to be about "child online exploitation", that's plenty reason to be skeptical. "Think of the children" is a powerful weapon because it'
by thephyber 6y ago
If the bill still claims to be about "child online exploitation", that's plenty reason to be skeptical. "Think of the children" is a powerful weapon because it's easy for the sponsors to politically assassinate anyone who votes against it. Source: I worked for a company that used that argument when lobbying.
I know enough about myself to know I'm not qualified to represent myself in court and I'm not qualified to read the text of a bill and pretend like I understand it.
I trust the EFF[1] to represent my values.
[1] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/07/new-earn-it-bill-still-threatens-encryption-and-free-speech https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/07/new-earn-it-bill-still...
- anonbcpolitics 6y agoYou don't need to be a lawyer to read this bill, it's pretty short and clear. Even if you don't understand all of it, it's good to read the source so you know you're not getting cherry-picked information.
- JoeSmithson 6y agoBy this logic, no legislation can ever seek to reduce online child sexual exploitation
- thephyber 6y agoI'd prefer we stop all sexual exploitation, not just online and not just of children. That said, all new legislation must weigh what is lost against what we anticipate to gain.