By the rules proposed by some writers of the NYT, most certainly yes. You could say he founded a lot of the fields of science known today, but he had of course

By the rules proposed by some writers of the NYT, most certainly yes. You could say he founded a lot of the fields of science known today, but he had of course "problematic" opinions. He should have known how to articulate himself ~2000 yeaers ago, give or take. No wonder Greece has monetary problems today with such a toxic marketplace culture. If you ask me I would cancel Plato first though. I neither like his face, nor his opinions. But fun aside, I do think that classical philosophy can be a discipline of self-reinforcing wankers.