3 ms·
The answer is rbenv :) The ruby language has also sped up a lot since 2008, which has helped Rails. I catch your point about the slowness being in the client t
by burlesona 6y ago
The answer is rbenv :)
The ruby language has also sped up a lot since 2008, which has helped Rails. I catch your point about the slowness being in the client these days, but 500ms would be an exceptionally unusually slow response from the rails application in any of the production rails apps I’ve run.
- syspec 6y agoI'm still using RVM, is RBENV the recommended approach now? What are the key differences for a user?
- robotmay 6y agoPersonally I swapped from rbenv to asdf a while back. I don't think there's any real justification for one over another these days, just use the one you're comfortable with :D
- e12e 6y agoHappy asdf user here. If you're only using ruby, then asdf isn't much better or worse - but asdf is great for supporting other toolchain, like python, crystal, rust, go... AFAIK the asdf ruby plug-in uses rbenv under the hood.
- fphilipe 6y agoI've switch from rbenv to chruby[1] years ago. Seems simpler and doesn't have the rehash command that is (was?) required with rbenv. All it does it adjust your PATH. 1: https://github.com/postmodern/chruby https://github.com/postmodern/chruby
- Dirlewanger 6y agorbenv handles only ruby versions, whereas rvm also handles gem installations. I think it's simpler when you let rbenv handle ruby versions and bundler handle the gems, because you have to deal with bundler anyway.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- bovermyer 6y agoThe other responses to your comment would appear to indicate the rbenv/asdf/etc. question is still unanswered.