OK, I read the first sentence and it sounded like a typical poor-quality marketing-blather article so I came here and read your post. I then reread it and it i

OK, I read the first sentence and it sounded like a typical poor-quality marketing-blather article so I came here and read your post. I then reread it and it indeed read like a weird, rambling, incoherent article. Looking at it closely, it had a good many contradictory, meaningless and incoherent sentences.("It is a popular forum with many types of posts and posters.") The headline, however, seemed about right. It's true the nonsense in this article is a bit different than the nonsense of a GPT-2 article. But the thing GPT-2 paragraphs sound pretty coherent 'till they suddenly go off the rail. This is more like an article that was never quite on the rails and so it's slightly more internally cohesive. But not "better". Maybe the article just reflects the author's style. Anyone have a GPT-3 test site link?