3 ms·
Your outrage is against points I didn't make. I never said the police acted properly in this, or any other example. In fact, I think the police 'serve and prote
by nickff 6y ago
Your outrage is against points I didn't make. I never said the police acted properly in this, or any other example. In fact, I think the police 'serve and protect' only the state and themselves.
My points were about our current social-media situation, where we have vast amounts of information, and people are able to filter it through their lens of choice.
- TaylorAlexander 6y agoI’ve seen plenty of videos of the police walking up to peaceful protesters and suddenly beating them with clubs, or video of boring traffic stops where the police decide to shoot the person. What fuller context could be provided that would change the meaning of these acts?
- kazagistar 6y agoRight. The talk of filter lenses forgets that some are a bit closer to reality then others. Anyways, I just assume by full context they mean something like "you gotta show those n______ and bums who is boss or they might get uppity".
- kQq9oHeAz6wLLS 6y ago> I’ve seen plenty of videos of the police walking up to peaceful protesters and suddenly beating them with clubs, or video of boring traffic stops where the police decide to shoot the person. Examples, please
- erentz 6y agoGreg Doucette on Twitter is a good place to start.
- yeetawayhn 6y agoThe bodybuilder? Because that what shows up in the search results.
- erentz 6y agoThe lawyer