> In this case chemical imbalance would be objectively wrong. I disagree. Chemical imbalance is not necessarily a solitary cause, it's describing a condition r

> In this case chemical imbalance would be objectively wrong. I disagree. Chemical imbalance is not necessarily a solitary cause, it's describing a condition regardless. shrug > you would have doctors selectively treating the symptoms (the 'chemical imbalance') rather than the cause Typically they treat both or in most cases, the easier problem with less severe treatment consequences (classic House MD - live in constant pain from muscle death vs lose a limb).