3 ms·
Very interesting but an ELI5 of the implications would be welcome: Okay it needs 2 injection. Do they need to be spaced by 42 days? If so that would induce nu
by The_rationalist 6y ago
Very interesting but an ELI5 of the implications would be welcome:
Okay it needs 2 injection.
Do they need to be spaced by 42 days?
If so that would induce nuisible inertia.
How many percents of the patients recovered from the covid thanks to to the injection?
I see 80% of response but I don't know how that translate into chance de of curing.
Also how fast did they recover?
The second injection has an adverse response, how bad is it? Too much for mainstream?
It's always fascinated me, this paradox of reporting:
The author has made a lot of researchs and a great write-up but fail to answer the most pressing questions that both mainstream people and shareholders wants!
- thepangolino 6y agoThe two injections are mostly due to safety protocols.
- christoph 6y agoOn the linked Twitter thread from the article there is a link to the AE chart https://twitter.com/RNAiAnalyst/status/1283149377427701761/photo/1 https://twitter.com/RNAiAnalyst/status/1283149377427701761/p...
- The_rationalist 6y agoThanks! I would love to see a similar chart of competing vaccines. So the side effects are huge relative to standard vaccines but rationally, if it works everybody should still take it. This will need to be enforced by politicians as I doubt people would have the maturity to take it voluntarily. It's the kind of wicked problem where we want that everybody take it except ourselves
- searine 6y ago>So the side effects are huge Those side effects are very mild. Headache. Myalgia. etc. How many times in your life has your arm been sore after a flu shot? These need to be measured but are not 'huge side effects'. No observed adverse event met the pre-defined cutoffs for stopping the trial.