3 ms·
I love this, although I can't help but think this is such a capitalist solution to this problem: private detectives, private whistleblowing, private bounty hunt
by Aissen 6y ago
I love this, although I can't help but think this is such a capitalist solution to this problem: private detectives, private whistleblowing, private bounty hunters. The american market is obviously better without those frauds, but what does that mean in the long run ? Any fraud under this threshold (without whistleblowing bounties, or too small bounties) can continue happening ?
- 1123581321 6y agoIn the long run, it should mean investment into products and services that lower the cost/difficulty, expanding the number of whistleblowers. A threshold shouldn’t exist unless there is a protectionist element to the SEC program (I have not participated myself.)