3 ms·
> I could guess that this lower circulation is, at least partly, the result of readers who don’t appreciate a false reality being reported as truth. The NYT's
by burnte 6y ago
> I could guess that this lower circulation is, at least partly, the result of readers who don’t appreciate a false reality being reported as truth.
The NYT's subscription rates are way up since Trump was elected.
> I’m already surprised how long they’ve lasted.
You already stated why they're seeing such success. "the result of readers who don’t appreciate a false reality being reported as truth."
- prepend 6y agoDigital subscribers have been consistently up since they started a digital subscription [0] but I meant actual readers since I think digital subscriptions earn less than historical subscribers and number of subscribers has a lot of variability of what price is paid. I was thinking of their profit and revenue [1] that keeps trending down (although this year is up). That’s probably a better sign of actual readers over time, I think. [0] https://www.statista.com/statistics/315041/new-york-times-company-digital-subscribers/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/315041/new-york-times-co... [1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/192848/revenue-of-the-new-york-times-company-since-2006/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/192848/revenue-of-the-ne...