4 ms·
Tanks are a bit showy when you can just have the police and National Guard shoot protestors without consequence: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_sho
by claudeganon 6y ago
Tanks are a bit showy when you can just have the police and National Guard shoot protestors without consequence:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Park_(Berkeley) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Park_(Berkeley)
Shooting workers that unionized was also common:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattimer_massacre https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattimer_massacre
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaconda_Road_massacre https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaconda_Road_massacre
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbine_Mine_massacre https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbine_Mine_massacre
- gruez 6y ago>Tanks are a bit showy when you can just have the police and National Guard shoot protestors without consequence: uhh... what? Have you checked the "legal action" section? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings#Legal_action https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings#Legal_act... or did you expect that the guards' heads be put on a pike? Oh, and don't forget that we can talk about what happened freely. Try doing that in China.
- claudeganon 6y agoYes? They were never convicted of anything. Perhaps read it again yourself.
- save_ferris 6y agoHard to compare these two scenarios. Look, I’m not arguing that US officials throughout the course of history have been perfect. Kent State was an atrocity, no question. But anyone with a gun can pull the trigger. It takes an enormous amount of coordination to uniformly run over people with tanks, burn their bodies, and flush them down drains. The incidents you’ve linked are undoubtedly dark chapters, but they are not comparable to what we’ve seen in China.
- claudeganon 6y agoI would never say that the US is an authoritarian state on par with the vileness of the PRC. But your specific claim was that we’ve never done to our own citizens what happened to the protesters at Tiananmen, which I now guess hinges on how coordinated the killings were. I think this is historically inaccurate, absent engaging in this kind of special pleading.
- save_ferris 6y agoThink about it. You had troops in China that were ready and willing to not only kill their countrymen, but also desecrate their dead bodies and discard them in an unimaginably cold manner. Contrast that with Kent State, Jackson State, and other places where troops were deployed and the situation escalated. The ultimate difference here is that it’s perfectly legal and acceptable for us to talk about what happened at Kent state. The events are not in dispute. China, on the other hand, jails people for talking about Tiananmen Square. To acknowledge the existence of such heinous acts is itself a crime in that country. The fact that we can sit here and argue about this without fear of going to prison is itself proof that these situations, and countries, are incomparable.
- rayiner 6y agoIt’s not even just that. It’s that the government indicted five guardsman at the times, but couldn’t secure convictions. A civil trial ended in settlement. Fifty years later, we’re still talking about four deaths.
- Chiba-City 6y agoOur USA runs a larger prison labor colony far larger than any real or imaginary Soviet Gulag. Get real real. Brits are filthy racist losers who deserve every harm that comes their way. Narcotics peddlers. They would be wise to behead their landed "royalty" and catch up to "modernity."
- chub500 6y agoParent obviously cares about the truth, evidenced by their references. It is amazing to me how so many freely thinking individuals can completely disregard the importance of free speech. How many of your references would be visible to a Chinese citizen? Doesn't the fact that we can discuss the US government's misdeeds on their own soil mean anything to you? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_websites_blocked_in_mainland_China https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_websites_blocked_in_...
- Chiba-City 6y agoThe French wisely censor American broadcast "media." Broadcast lies never delineates "free speech." I went to Harvard. I have written paychecks for former NSA employees. I have friends and family at the World Bank, Reuters and NYT. They are paid handsomely to lie, with "talking points" dictated by CIA at Langley.
- jryle70 6y agoReally? So CBS News apparently didn't get paid by CIA when they expose Abu Ghraib scandal [0], and NYT must have forgotten about that as well when they partnered with the Guardian to publish Edward Snowden's leak [1]. Those are two of the biggest reveals of the last two decades. Talking about Snowden, I have always wondered why there's never been a Chinese whistleblower. Nobody working in Chinese intelligence has the courage or conscience, or they have no way to let the world know? [0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisone... [1] - https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-security-snowden-guardian/guardian-teams-up-with-new-york-times-over-snowden-documents-idUSBRE97I10E20130824 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-security-snowden-guar...
- BrandonMarc 6y agoThank you for bringing up Kent State. That event is taught in history classes all over the country as an example of something we did wrong, and desperately want to never repeat. Contrast this with Tiananmen Square: Beijing does everything it can to prevent its citizens knowing about it, and is all to happy to cultivate a reputation that they would gladly do it again today. Really good example. Thank you.