Gp clearly implies getting consensus would be the hard part for this ID to become an “IETF document”. You can strip all context and argue that every single stat

Gp clearly implies getting consensus would be the hard part for this ID to become an “IETF document”. You can strip all context and argue that every single statement is correct in isolation, but that’s not how communication works. This pointless bickering also adds zero new info, so I’ll stop here.