4 ms·
Would be ok if everyone was wearing a mask. You go to the bathroom, cough cough, you go to the restaurant, cough cough, and you're driving back home with your f
by uwuwuwu 6y ago
Would be ok if everyone was wearing a mask. You go to the bathroom, cough cough, you go to the restaurant, cough cough, and you're driving back home with your friends in the car, cough cough. If we tried to reduce infection during these occasions, there maybe wasn't even a need for much lock-down.
Germany is about to get rid of wearing masks in stores. That's like turning off the firewall because the attack is over. It's preventive, so you need to wear a mask before sth happens.
I'd be very happy if there was an experiment, just for 4 weeks everybody should wear the damn mask both in private and public, and see what happens.
How can so many people fail to grasp the concept of prevention?
- daddy_ 6y agoWow, we’re really caught up in yelling at each other. Seems convenient for the people in charge of our response over the past six months and the organizations that have spent decades preparing for pandemics.
- uwuwuwu 6y agoI didn't mean to yell - I'm simply astonished. A mask costs like 0.15€ or 0.17$ (based on Taiwans price with overall comparable price levels in Germany). Two masks a week, that cost is next to nothing. I think the response in Germany is quite good compared to many others. My main issue is: we compromise on having some infections and deaths, rather than compromising on wearing a mask.
- mns 6y agoWhat are you talking about? Everyone wears a mask in Germany in closed spaces and public transport. I haven't seen a single person not do it and it's already part of daily life. I don't understand the point here?
- uwuwuwu 6y agoMeck Pomm country wants to get rid of wearing masks.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- detaro 6y agoThe economics Minister of MeckPomm wants to. His boss doesn't. The federal health Minister also disagrees, as do most other states: https://www.rnd.de/politik/maskenpflicht-in-den-bundeslandern-so-stehen-die-einzelnen-lander-zu-masken-im-einzelhandel-42SWUYRJG5BI3GKDS4FKCSBZEA.html https://www.rnd.de/politik/maskenpflicht-in-den-bundeslander...
- mns 6y agoI don't think this will happen, I also HOPE it won't happen too soon, in Bayern we still have restrictions on number of people that are allowed to meet. Austria got rid of masks almost everywhere, but you still need to wear them in public transport and pharmacies, so I'm pretty sure they will be with us for a while.
- mcntsh 6y ago> Germany is about to get rid of wearing masks in stores. That's like turning off the firewall because the attack is over. It's preventive, so you need to wear a mask before sth happens. There were 140 new cases in Germany yesterday in a country of 83 million. In my city of 3,5 million there were 17 new cases. At what point would you say it's safe to not wear a mask in stores?
- uwuwuwu 6y agoAs long as there is a very volatile equilibrium, I'd wish we play safe -- because there is absolutely no cost associated with wearing masks. We've seen that local outbreaks happen, and that local authorities hesitate to take action.
- ulfw 6y agoWhen it's been ZERO for a while. Obviously? I don't understand this question at all. As long a there's >=1 case and little immunity the virus WILL spread.
- mcntsh 6y agoWasn't it the goal all along to flatten the curve and gradually introduce herd immunity while softening the impact on hospitals? No one estimates a vaccine any time remotely soon and even with one it would take years at best to achieve zero cases globally.
- uwuwuwu 6y agoThe issue with herd immunity are the unknown long term risks. Just imagine this stuff wrecks your immune system a couple of months after infection. Or, that immunity goes away after some months. There's no guarantee that herd immunity helps. On the other hand, we could be working all hands on deck to arrange our lifestyle AND protect from infection.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> Wasn't it the goal all along to flatten the curve and gradually introduce herd immunity while softening the impact on hospitals? No, suppression was the goal. At least, the study that turned the tide on policy concluded that targeting suppression was essential.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]