2 ms·
The video/stream in question was restored almost 5 days ago, shortly after this happened. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrFa4B0Ghjk&feature=youtu.be https://
by gundmc 6y ago
The video/stream in question was restored almost 5 days ago, shortly after this happened.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrFa4B0Ghjk&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrFa4B0Ghjk&feature=youtu.be
AI misses will happen, I'm generally okay with them if they're identified and resolved quickly. The concerning thing to me here is that his request for appeal was rejected in 30 seconds. What actually happens when you click appeal? Clearly it's automated, so why not run that logic before taking the stream down?
- infogulch 6y agoI've never heard of the appeal actually doing anything other than just existing. Maybe it notes down that the user attempted to appeal (which may be a useful signal for YT), but I wouldn't be surprised if it's just sends a single template response to every request.
- lopmotr 6y agoIf they're really random, that's not so bad. Just like other computer failures. But Youtube alters people's behavior out of fear. You see Youtubers replacing "dangerous" words with joke words even though they're not saying anything bad, they're just scared. Often it's no use that it gets restored the next day because the prime money making time has passed. Options to appeals are probably just there to string people along and wear them down.