3 ms·
Uh, the smaller planes are quite pleasant to fly on. Better cabin pressurization and larger windows. They also allow more long-haul routes. Besides a 777 is no
by hodgesrm 6y ago
Uh, the smaller planes are quite pleasant to fly on. Better cabin pressurization and larger windows. They also allow more long-haul routes.
Besides a 777 is not that much smaller than a 747.
- amelius 6y agoGiven the damage it causes to the environment, flying should be less comfortable, not more.
- hodgesrm 6y agoDamage compared to what alternative? If I need to go somewhere as an individual, it's quite a bit more efficient to fly vs. driving. An Airbus A319Neo gets 122 mpg per seat. That's almost 5 times the 2017 average gas mileage for American cars. [2] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_economy_in_aircraft#Short-haul_flights https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_economy_in_aircraft#Short... [2] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-epa-emissions-autos/u-s-auto-fleet-hit-record-high-fuel-efficiency-in-2017-idUSKCN1QN23N https://www.reuters.com/article/us-epa-emissions-autos/u-s-a...