4 ms·
It'd be hard to argue that it ISN'T "readable." Maybe some would think it's ugly (I don't), but objectively speaking it's ticking every "readability" box.
by komali2 6y ago
It'd be hard to argue that it ISN'T "readable." Maybe some would think it's ugly (I don't), but objectively speaking it's ticking every "readability" box.
- kingnight 6y agoLegible might be a better word? The giant, viewport spanning, line-width mixed with dense line-height makes it harder on eye for some people, myself included.
- smichel17 6y agoOn mobile it's very difficult to read because the font is too small and line width is too long, so I have to choose between squinting or scrolling back and forth and back and forth and.. (or use Firefox's reader mode). I don't mind plain text, but this site is several orders of magnitude harder to read than http://motherfuckingwebsite.com http://motherfuckingwebsite.com
- komali2 6y agoWoah really? It rendered just like motherfuckingwebsite for me on mobile. edit: I was using readermode lol. The site does not look good at all on mobile.
- shanemhansen 6y agoOn mobile it's really easy for me to read. Don't is at a natural size and lines wrap appropriately. [edit] Oh I see it looks bad in Firefox on mobile. Fair enough.
- lordgrenville 6y agoIt's pretty uncomfortable to read on desktop, too - at least on my large monitor - since there are no margins.
- smichel17 6y agoI do most of my HN browsing in the app [Materialistic], so I usually first look at articles using the built-in webview, then open externally in Firefox if that doesn't render correctly (which is unfortunately common. Not sure why, but I'm inclined to blame either the app or webview; for example, Wikipedia is served as a static site but renders as a blank page). In this case, they both rendered the same way (but was able to read the page with FF's reader mode). [Materialistic]: https://f-droid.org/en/packages/io.github.hidroh.materialistic/ https://f-droid.org/en/packages/io.github.hidroh.materialist...
- jeppesen-io 6y agoI'll admit my comment was snarky, but I'll say it has hard for me to read. I cant say exactly why, but I do have a knee-jerk reaction
- benhurmarcel 6y agoThe lines are too long. It's not very readable.
- billwear 6y agoI broke the lines up some, but tech discussions aren't going to be TV dialog, it's not healthy that way! :)
- therealdrag0 6y agoThe point is that there is no margins. On my screen the lines are 275 characters long! This is 2-4x more standard formats. You don't need to break the lines up, you need to wrap them sooner with styling.