6 ms·
I really, truly wish HN would moderate and remove comments about a link's medium. Every single post here has at least one person complaining about the layout of
by allzeros 6y ago
I really, truly wish HN would moderate and remove comments about a link's medium. Every single post here has at least one person complaining about the layout of the source. Every time. It's exhausting. I hate it. It contributes absolutely nothing, and I don't know if anyone's noticed, but people keep using Twitter! Gasp! If you hate Twitter so much, reach out to the tweet author and ask them to publish elsewhere. If you hate Medium, e-mail the author and ask them to switch platforms. But dear God, can we please stop complaining about it in HN comments? Either read it or don't.
Please just stop.
- ethanwillis 6y agoIt's a valid point of discussion. What isn't is you actually complaining. You could take your own advice and write to Dang about the moderation?
- tomc1985 6y agoSqueaky wheels get the oil. Sorry dude...
- Waterluvian 6y agoHow on earth can this individual’s speech vex you to such an extent that you need it silenced?
- ardit33 6y agoIt adds 0 to the conversation. It is very weird, almost borderline autistic behaviour... 90% of links, have some kind of: "doesn't work on my mobile... format sucks, i don't like the colors, etc... etc.." comment. It is pure infantile/juvenile bikesheding and distracting from the point of the conversation/link that has nothing to do with formatting.
- dang 6y agoWe could consider adding a guideline asking people not to post such things. The problem is that sometimes such comments are helpful for the owner of a site, who either shared their own work or happened to be on here when someone else did.
- tptacek 6y agoMy guess is that's pretty unusual, and that if you looked at a sample of, like, 20 of them, in at least 19 cases whatever was being complained about would remain the case on the website in question, indicating that the site owner did not get value from them. Meanwhile: those comments really are a pox on the threads; it'd be better if users were in the habit of downvoting them to keep the top of the thread clear, which a guideline would accomplish.
- dang 6y agoCare to suggest a wording for it?
- tptacek 6y agoDiscuss substance, not presentation, unless presentation is the topic of the story. Comments about web design and readability are off-topic. Advice for authors is best delivered through a polite private email.
- dang 6y agoJust to calibrate: would you say "this site breaks the back button fuck I fucking hate that" should be under this umbrella?
- isoskeles 6y agoDevil's advocating here, because I agree more with your sentiment: That comment has sparked a larger subthread specifically about Twitter as a medium, rather than the content of the post. This specific subthread is so popular, it's near the top of the page every time I refresh this post. So we could say it stifles discussion, also because people are prone to voting up a comment like that despite the fact that it's not really relevant to the post.
- lultimouomo 6y agoAnd that's why the [-] button is so awesome.
- preommr 6y agoThen let me add that this is a particularly bad case. I know there's a user called foone that has gotten posted to HN enough times that they explained why they use twitter to make posts instead of writing a blog (they have adhd, and they find it easier to write on twitter). Which is reasonable since there's an empathical justification. And I've read other twitter threads in the past, which were fine. Usually, people just write out a paragraph but broken over multiple tweets. This is the first time that I've seen someone try and link other videos/posts/images which is somehow so much worse.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]