I disagree with your initial statement. You are saying no specific bill was introduced to ensure this condition, which is a different stance. > It doesn't even

I disagree with your initial statement. You are saying no specific bill was introduced to ensure this condition, which is a different stance. > It doesn't even appropriate any money. So what? The entirety of the bill might be a good reference...like an appropriate number of broadband conduits are installed along such highway to accommodate multiple broadband providers, > Whether or not the government money has been properly used is a fair discussion, but a separate one. That is the core of the discussion. Reread the thread.