3 ms·
People are drawing, creating music, making movies, editing photos on their mobile OSes. Saying that they are "mostly uses" does not make them so. Freedom and p
by rimliu 6y ago
People are drawing, creating music, making movies, editing photos on their mobile OSes. Saying that they are "mostly uses" does not make them so.
Freedom and privacy are at odds. If I give any app the freedom to access my messages or call list, does it increase or decrease privacy?
- raxxorrax 6y ago> If I give any app the freedom to access my messages or call list, does it increase or decrease privacy? I have an app(lication) that has access to my messages. It doesn't do anything with them aside from showing them to me on request. It doesn't affect my privacy at all because doing so is far beyond its scope. If I had shitty apps, I would agree, but until now those seem mostly restricted to shitty app stores. But if they cannot be trusted, they cannot be trusted to see my messages at all. > People are drawing, creating music, making movies, editing photos on their mobile OSes True, they are not completely useless, just mostly. I can do that on other OS with far more freedom. Artists generally don't like restraints too much and I do actually paint digitally. Wouldn't know how to connect it to a mobile device, nevermind the atrocious software selection. The cameras on mobile devices are nice though. Don't think the common mobile OS makes handling image date easy at all. Even most normal users want images on their desktop as soon as possible.