3 ms·
Sounds like a common math mistake. Wouldn't it have to be 42.857143% more expensive to make up for giving Apple a 30% cut of the total? Or is Google just throwi
by natch 6y ago
Sounds like a common math mistake. Wouldn't it have to be 42.857143% more expensive to make up for giving Apple a 30% cut of the total? Or is Google just throwing up its hands here? Or is their math that bad? Or maybe my math is bad, I don't know.
- benhurmarcel 6y agoThe Apple fee is 30% on the first payment (so 42% more expensive), but afterwards it's 15% for a continuous subscription (18% more). Averaging it to 30% and rounding doesn't seem too crazy.
- natch 6y ago>The Apple fee is 30% on the first payment (so 42% more expensive) "so" But that doesn't necessarily follow, unless it actually is a 42% higher number than a known reference number for the price of the same subscription service and period on another platform.