3 ms·
If it was only third parties, then maybe. But if google analytics actually tracks data from a logged in incognito session, then it's probably a completely diffe
by lostmyoldone 6y ago
If it was only third parties, then maybe. But if google analytics actually tracks data from a logged in incognito session, then it's probably a completely different in the eyes of the law.
It becomes more like: The mask maker put the name tag on your shirt. The tag was also put on in the same booth where you bought the mask that promised anonymity, and it was also the mask maker who supplied the record of your tag number to a third party.
- notatoad 6y ago>a logged in incognito session you cannot sign into chrome while incognito, so i'm not sure what you mean by a "logged in incognito session", that's not a thing. The only type of sign in available while in incognito mode is to sign into a website, and the website does not know that you're in incognito mode. And if you've entered your username and password into the google login form, of course they're tracking you, how could they not be?
- hrktb 6y agoIncognito stills works with sessions, keeps cookies. Which means if you login to a google service, your whole session with all its tabs is logged in, and not just that single site. Not arguing this shouldn’t work that way, but the wording of logged in incognito session seems fair to me.
- burnte 6y agoExcept that's not what happened. The user put on the name tag. If you use a tool incorrectly, it's not the tool's fault.