4 ms·
This is going to sound like I want to eat the cake and still have it, but I wish there was some sort of balance between real estate, sharpness, and affordabilit
by adtac 6y ago
This is going to sound like I want to eat the cake and still have it, but I wish there was some sort of balance between real estate, sharpness, and affordability. A 24in 4K monitor without scaling makes text too small, but at 200%, it's no different from a 1080p monitor real estate-wise (even though text is much crisper). My current monitor, a 1440p 24in screen at 100%, serves all of my real estate needs, but leaves something to be desired in terms of sharpness, so a 5K screen at 200% and similar physical size would be perfect; alas, there aren't any general-purpose 5K monitors at an affordable price. 8K screens at 300% would offer similar, albeit slightly lower, real estate at even better text sharpness, but there's just one such monitor from Dell and it's ridiculously expensive.
I hope 5K monitors become as cheap as 4K monitors over the next few years.
- Dylan16807 6y ago> 8K screens at 300% would offer similar, albeit slightly lower, real estate at even better text sharpness 5K @ 200% = 5120 / 2 = 2560 8K @ 300% = 7680 / 3 = 2560
- adtac 6y agoOops, you're right, I knew I should've just used Python instead of trying to do that in my head :)
- plorkyeran 6y ago5k 27" imacs have been out for a few years now, but the screen is a pretty significant chunk of the cost.
- adtac 6y agoWhich is why I said "general-purpose 5K". I want to use the hypothetical perfect monitors with a i3-like window manager on Linux.
- asdff 6y agoYou can make text bigger without scaling in pretty much every application there is with text.