4 ms·

You are greatly mistaken, although it does depend on the quality of the preparation. I have seen scores improve 100-200 points per skill on average for middle

by csa 6y ago

You are greatly mistaken, although it does depend on the quality of the preparation. I have seen scores improve 100-200 points per skill on average for middle range scores, and 50-100 points per skill for higher range scores with quality preparation. Reasons: - familiarity with test format - improved test taking strategies - familiarity with test content - developing the mental stamina to perform at a high level throughout the relatively long test - lowered anxiety and (often) increased confidence

yasp 6y ago
Is this just personal anecdata?
- csa 6y ago
  An acquaintance of mine runs a high end SAT training program. He gets these results reliably for folks who have had little or no preparation before coming to him. Trained test takes is in the hundreds (maybe more). Is this data or anecdata? You be the judge. He finds it easy to bank on professionally. I encourage you to talk to someone who has worked at a high-end SAT training program (not Kaplan or that type). They can tell you the real deal, both successes and failures. Don’t rely on talking to the businesses themselves, because they will be selling their services rather than telling the complete truth (unless you know them personally). Fwiw, failures are usually due to one of a few factors: 1. anxiety 2. learning blocks 3. physical issues (e.g., lack of sleep, sick, etc.).
georgeecollins 6y ago
The SAT goes from 200 - 800. If test prep raises average score by 100 points, there still is some room for the test to show actual knowledge. The college board says that an SAT is better predictor of success in college than GPA, which based on my experience of American high schools makes sense. I get that wealth probably has a positive correlation to both. But it seems that should matter a little.
hackinthebochs 6y ago
Why do you exclude learning the material as a reason? My test prep was largely a matter of learning material that I missed or wasn't taught effectively during school.
- csa 6y ago
  I would group that under familiarity with test content. Maybe an opaque label on my part.
muzaffarpur 6y ago
although? Or the most important factor is, quality of prep. A man/women who have continuously, kept practicing to improve academically, becomes insignificant. However, keep throwing ball in hoop would help math and science innovations. This is absolutely insane.

by csa 6y ago

yasp 6y ago

Is this just personal anecdata?

csa 6y ago
An acquaintance of mine runs a high end SAT training program. He gets these results reliably for folks who have had little or no preparation before coming to him. Trained test takes is in the hundreds (maybe more). Is this data or anecdata? You be the judge. He finds it easy to bank on professionally. I encourage you to talk to someone who has worked at a high-end SAT training program (not Kaplan or that type). They can tell you the real deal, both successes and failures. Don’t rely on talking to the businesses themselves, because they will be selling their services rather than telling the complete truth (unless you know them personally). Fwiw, failures are usually due to one of a few factors: 1. anxiety 2. learning blocks 3. physical issues (e.g., lack of sleep, sick, etc.).

georgeecollins 6y ago

The SAT goes from 200 - 800. If test prep raises average score by 100 points, there still is some room for the test to show actual knowledge. The college board says that an SAT is better predictor of success in college than GPA, which based on my experience of American high schools makes sense. I get that wealth probably has a positive correlation to both. But it seems that should matter a little.

hackinthebochs 6y ago

Why do you exclude learning the material as a reason? My test prep was largely a matter of learning material that I missed or wasn't taught effectively during school.

csa 6y ago
I would group that under familiarity with test content. Maybe an opaque label on my part.

muzaffarpur 6y ago

although? Or the most important factor is, quality of prep. A man/women who have continuously, kept practicing to improve academically, becomes insignificant. However, keep throwing ball in hoop would help math and science innovations. This is absolutely insane.