4 ms·
It blocks some tracking, but is it a good content blocker? Last time I checked I still needed to install ublock or equivalent for acceptable performance. How ha
by a_imho 6y ago
It blocks some tracking, but is it a good content blocker? Last time I checked I still needed to install ublock or equivalent for acceptable performance. How hard it is to incorporate something an extension already provides?
- pbhjpbhj 6y agoNot hard at all, they could include uBlock add-on by default (as they did with Pocket) except allow people to disable it this time. They do rely on Google's advertising revenue for multiple $100M of funding; so they presumably don't want to be too successful in democratising ad-blocking. Eich used to be a controlling influence on FF (as Mozilla CEO), since he was ousted he heads Brave browser which includes content blocking by default (and a content revenue model). In short perhaps FF/Mozilla are curtailed by financial considerations.
- TheRealPomax 6y agoNot unless they buy uBlock first, which is what they did with Pocket. And unlike Pocket, which was already a company looking to get bought, uBlock is very much not that.
- pythux 6y agoNit: you must be talking about uBlock Origin, because uBlock was actually bought[1]. [1] https://blog.getadblock.com/the-adblock-family-gets-a-new-addition-62a887d36960 https://blog.getadblock.com/the-adblock-family-gets-a-new-ad...
- behnamoh 6y agoBut even Brave doesn't block some google ads.