2 ms·
I 100% agree. But isn't a competing news outlet writing an article about a missing label just a bit on-the-nose? Particularly when considering the photo in qu
by CivBase 6y ago
I 100% agree. But isn't a competing news outlet writing an article about a missing label just a bit on-the-nose? Particularly when considering the photo in question.
- orwin 6y agoI think the fact that it happened 3 time to describe one event warrant a pat on the head and a "we got you" article.
- nkozyra 6y agoI don't follow the "on-the-nose" comment in this context. In theory, the media serves as the public watchdog for government. If media violates the ethical standards they should be called out. The truth is television media has always had low standards for these rules versus print media. That it transfers to their digital properties is no surprise.
- fredsanford 6y agoTelevision is called a medium because it is neither rare nor well done. Ernie Kovacs sometime in the '60s