3 ms·
No, they said they could not prove themselves to have done nothing. I know those things feel equivalent, but they represent entirely opposite ends of perspectiv
by Talanes 6y ago
No, they said they could not prove themselves to have done nothing. I know those things feel equivalent, but they represent entirely opposite ends of perspective. In the scenario they have to prove themselves innocent, the cop needs provide no justification.
- yeetawayhn 6y agoNo, their claim isn't that they didn't throw tear gas at the police, but that they were justified in doing so.