4 ms·
Fortunately for you the whole thing is written in unobfuscated .NET so the source can be easily recovered.
by CawCawCaw 6y ago
Fortunately for you the whole thing is written in unobfuscated .NET so the source can be easily recovered.
- lvs 6y agoWhy couldn't they just put up the source then? A closed-source privacy tool is quite the contradiction.
- userbinator 6y agoI wish people would stop thinking of open-source like it's some sort of panacea. The Ken Thompson Hack should be enough proof that what really matters is what gets run, not what the source code says. For decades, the Windows community thrived with mods and such, all without source code. If you have an unobfuscated .NET binary you pretty much have the source, and it will be honestly what it says it does.
- prophesi 6y agoIt's not a panacea, but it's objectively better than closed-source. Thank you for pointing out that the binary is unobfuscated.
- lanisik655 6y agocorrect. Шt amazes me that people blame WPD for closedsource, but they themselves use shutup10 :facepalm:
- lvs 6y agoStraw man. Nobody said it's a panacea.
- lanisik655 6y agosure sure, shutup10 - closed source (with Obfuscated DLL inside), Microsoft partner :3