2 ms·
This is the pernicious dynamic. For Large landlords, certainly but also generally, you have a situation where property appreciation becomes more important than
by joe_the_user 6y ago
This is the pernicious dynamic. For Large landlords, certainly but also generally, you have a situation where property appreciation becomes more important than rental income, so evicting people and getting nothing becomes a better outcome than lowering rent.
Edit: Also note this appreciation driven dynamic is something of a product of QE - printing money. As the treasury dumps money into markets, anything of apparently reliable value, "money-like", becomes more valuable - commodities and land being examples but the "best" companies also. This appreciation process becomes more important than the ordinary use of the object in the case of land (empty mansions in London being the prime example but we may wind-up with many more if the approach continues).
- michaelmrose 6y agoIf you raise taxes on non owner occupied housing you can achieve any reasonable target for real estate "investing" you desire. If you just want to target holding but not renting property because it decreases housing supply you can do that even more aggressively. I'll take 100% of appreciation for the months it sat unoccupied if it sat unoccupied for 3 or more months for 1000 Alex.