4 ms·
Yes, but you wouldn't take the job for that wage (all else being equal) as wfh, because you need to fund an office space. Meanwhile the employer not funding acc
by pbhjpbhj 6y ago
Yes, but you wouldn't take the job for that wage (all else being equal) as wfh, because you need to fund an office space. Meanwhile the employer not funding accommodation (with all its concomitant costs: parking, cleaning, services, etc.) would have enough to pay you to have a home-office and still - by my estimations - save money.
I'm working from my bedroom, we're already short on bedroom space; I'll gladly work from home for a fraction of what my employer pays to accommodate me in an office. But I probably wouldn't have taken this job knowing I'd be stuck in my bedroom 18 hours a day.
- PaulDavisThe1st 6y agoWith 20%+ unemployment, you'll probably take any job you can get.
- pyuser583 6y agoYeah that 20% unemployment is a bit misleading - experienced tech people are still very much in demand.
- colinmhayes 6y agoThen I guess it's time for you to find a job that pays more or lets you work in an office.
- Mikeb85 6y agoThere will always be certain people who are more in demand than others. That doesn't mean aggregate demand isn't way down.