The point being that Andrew Gelman doesn't seem to have an agenda. The Lancet paper looks unconvincing to him and his gang of stats nerds who read and post ther

The point being that Andrew Gelman doesn't seem to have an agenda. The Lancet paper looks unconvincing to him and his gang of stats nerds who read and post there. The WHO are convinced, however. Should they be given the data is closed and appears suspect. (Maybe it isn't, but how do we know that for sure, when it looks really odd..?) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/25/who-world-health-organization-hydroxychloroquine-trial-trump-coronavirus-safety-fears https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/25/who-world-heal...