4 ms·
khuey's interpretation was my assumption too having seen the Twitter pictures of the damaged nacelles, and lack of landing gear, during the first go-around. The
by pbhjpbhj 6y ago
khuey's interpretation was my assumption too having seen the Twitter pictures of the damaged nacelles, and lack of landing gear, during the first go-around. The RAT being deployed suggested to me some sort of hydraulics fault too; or maybe engines had failed at that point?
So, what would you say caused that damage?
https://mobile.twitter.com/PlaneSpottersPK/status/1263810587152330752 https://mobile.twitter.com/PlaneSpottersPK/status/1263810587...
- jka 6y agoTo further elaborate (since it's the first time I'd heard about this system), the RAT ('Ram air turbine') as used on the A320 is a mechanism for generating power for flight-critical systems during emergencies. A good default stance to take in situations like this (especially so soon after a tragedy) is that the pilot and crew were likely fully capable and well-aware of what they were doing. [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ram_air_turbine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ram_air_turbine