4 ms·
Why 10%? Why not 5%? or 25%? Also, how would you chose who gets to stay? In any case I find it quite hard to justify a reduction of population based on being
by naringas 6y ago
Why 10%?
Why not 5%? or 25%?
Also, how would you chose who gets to stay?
In any case I find it quite hard to justify a reduction of population based on being able to have better sights
- dragosmocrii 6y agoIthink the ratio was chosen randomly, and is not important. What's important is to get the population number down in the longterm. Or, in other words, make sure that longterm the population doesn't grow beyond control. If you're having 2 kids in your lifetime, you're helping to drive the population down. Having at most2 kids is fair, don't! ou think?