4 ms·
So you're taking steps and not having children then?
by gonzo41 6y ago
So you're taking steps and not having children then?
- frequentnapper 6y agoAd hominem - tool of the mentally weak.
- whatshisface 6y agoThe irony of your comment is not lost on me. ;)
- frequentnapper 6y agoI'm just speaking in general terms of course :p
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- mmaunder 6y agoCorrect. I’m 46 years old, healthy, fertile, heterosexual and I don’t have any kids. How about you?
- seibelj 6y agoI'm doing what my ancestors did, from 3.75 billion years ago until now - reproduce!
- happppy 6y agoyup, reproduce because earth belongs to you and only you. We are just visiting here, will go back to our places.
- mmaunder 6y agoAnd there it is. A sudden torrent of downvotes. Dropped from 4 to zero in seconds. Like is said, having kids is considered a basic human right. We’re so arrogant, yet so basic as a species.
- aSplash0fDerp 6y agoYeah. Some folks need to grow another mouth to tell themselves what they wanna hear. Not being status quo is probably a bit too much for them. The exchange of opinions concept does work well for most though.
- alehander42 6y agoisn't this is a very simplistic view on having children? There are much more obvious reasons to have some. also, .. most of use have enough mouths to tell them what they wanna hear, including you and me and our supposed echo chambers all over the internet (yes, having children is egoistical and naive! you're right aSplash0fDerp man! .. yes, we will overcome those problems, children are our duty, you're right alehander42 ! )
- aSplash0fDerp 6y agoWhy some people want a trophy for ejaculating in a vagina, I will never know. With the popularity of brainwashing and groupthink, talking out of someone elses butt should be considered an evolution of ventriloquism. Its a neat trick if you don`t get out much.
- alehander42 6y agohaving a child might be more meaningful than the whole world, I love you, mate!
- aSplash0fDerp 6y agoI'm in the states, but using your "mate" reference as a cue... I'm currently looking at Austrailia to settle down and raise a family. I think the opportunity to find a young lady with natural resilience is much higher in AU. Using Mick Jagger as an example, we can populate the planet well into our 70's, so unless you age like a fried turd, there is no hurry.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- ohyeshedid 6y agoYou not having children to help slow population growth is like buying two powerball tickets to increase your chance of winning the jackpot.
- nitrogen 6y agoA case can also be made that those who want the least children for sustainability reasons should try to have more children who grow up to make a compounding difference in the future.
- torwayburger 6y agoNo evidence supports this.
- mmaunder 6y agoSo it’s ok to have 10 kids because they’ll be smarter than you are and make the right choice? So 10 to the power of how many generations would that be exactly?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- torwayburger 6y agoAye. I think you wrote that question with salty intent, but you're getting real answers. Hope that frames the thinking behind it for ya.
- dragosmocrii 6y agoSee my comment one level up. If you're having 2 children, you're already helping. If no one's having kids at all then we'd go extinct lol
- searchableguy 6y agoIs it bad though? If there are no us, there is no one who cares about our existence. There is no sense of losing something if something doesn't exist.