4 ms·
> The reason RSS failed to reach mainstream adoption by users is because it is not user friendly at all. While I love RSS myself, no amount of tech nerd nostalg
by apostacy 6y ago
> The reason RSS failed to reach mainstream adoption by users is because it is not user friendly at all. While I love RSS myself, no amount of tech nerd nostalgia is going to make it popular enough that your mom starts using it.
I think it is a false premise that something is only valid if "mom starts using it". That is the profit-driven mentality. eg. "how can we market this? How can we expand RSS market share into valuable demographics?" etc
Also, I actually did teach my Mom to use RSS a decade ago and she still uses it today.
These concepts are really not that hard. I told my mom it was like she was getting a newsletter from her blogs delivered to a special dedicated inbox, but without cluttering up her email. She was delighted.
I think if someone knows how to use email, and knows how to browse the web, and knows how to sign up for email newsletters, they can handle RSS. I would argue that it is in many ways more useful for less computer literate people.
> Then comes the UX nightmare of actually finding the feed on each website you visit. If the site even has one.
This UX nightmare was solved 15 years ago. Browsers displayed a little icon in the corner when RSS is detected.[1], Firefox later displayed an RSS icon prominently in the address bar[2].
The UX nightmare was then re-introduced as the RSS icon was de-emphasized[3][4] and eventually dropped completely, with a dubious justification.[5]
[1]: https://www.hanselman.com/blog/FeedAutoDiscovery.aspx https://www.hanselman.com/blog/FeedAutoDiscovery.aspx
[2]: http://scripting.com/images/2011/01/15/rssicon.gif http://scripting.com/images/2011/01/15/rssicon.gif
[3]: https://decafbad.com/blog/2011/01/15/how-to-use-feed-auto-discovery-in-firefox-4/ https://decafbad.com/blog/2011/01/15/how-to-use-feed-auto-di...
[4]: http://scripting.com/stories/2011/01/15/mozillaPleaseKeepTheRssIco.html http://scripting.com/stories/2011/01/15/mozillaPleaseKeepThe...
[5]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17613051 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17613051
- pembrook 6y agoI certainly agree, it's not that hard. Most things are not that hard. The problem isn't the difficulty level. It's friction. I mean, cooking healthy food for yourself and vacuuming your floors are both cognitively easy things to do. But most people don't have enough motivation to do these things all the time. It's why meal kits and the roomba exist. The minute you introduce the slightest bit of friction, you lose people. RSS contains enough friction to remove a 95%+ of potential users before they even get started. The reason why people prefer social media newsfeeds is because they have zero friction. I'm not arguing that the problem with RSS is that it should be driven by a profit mentality. I'm arguing the problem is 95%+ of people will never benefit from what it can potentially offer the world: a better way to consume the internet. I personally love RSS. Alongside email, it's my preferred method for reading the internet. However, I think the world would benefit more if the RSS ecosystem could be made viable for the average person. Whether that's a better protocol or a better client, I don't know.