5 ms·

No. It’s like saying sharing a Picasso painting with transformatively bad compression while not trying to change the art is worse than compression that doesn’t

No. It’s like saying sharing a Picasso painting with transformatively bad compression while not trying to change the art is worse than compression that doesn’t. If I took a tweet and changed every third word when trying to share it with others, would that be acceptable? If you can represent 16 million colors in video, then you can make a video that only uses a subset of those 256 colors (exactly what gif does). If you need the high frequency information then you can tune the encoder and still get a filesize that is an order of magnitude smaller than gif. I do admit that some 90s and 00s internet art is tightly coupled to its medium. There's no reason old art can't be converted to more efficient formats or that new art in an old style can't be made in new mediums. I should have prefaced with a statement that my argument is technical.

egfx 7y ago
> If you can represent 16 million colors in video, then you can make a video that only uses a subset of those 256 colors (exactly what gif does). If you need the high frequency information then you can tune the encoder and still get a filesize that is an order of magnitude smaller than gif. and that's like fitting a square peg into a round hole. If you downscale to a gif you get the graphical effects for free. https://i.imgur.com/8LdcFn5.gif https://i.imgur.com/8LdcFn5.gif
- Dylan16807 6y ago
  Downscaling to get a limiting effect 'for free' is not 'high art'. https://twitter.com/cyangmou/status/1254089487870722048 https://twitter.com/cyangmou/status/1254089487870722048 Pixel art is an art form, but you have to deliberately design around the medium. And there are other ways to deliberately design something to fit the gif format. But someone converting a generic animation or video to gif is not gaining anything.
  - egfx 6y ago
    Much of what art is, is serendipity, accident and discovery. If you’re overly deliberate your not creating high art. Anyway I just find it funny that gifs were invented to solve the problem of over sized video and now he’s saying that videos are solving the problems of over sized gifs.
    - Dylan16807 6y ago
      The format was designed so you could do simple animation in a way that otherwise acts like an image format. For actual video style content, it never saved space. And codecs for video have massively improved over the years, while gif hasn't.
    - willis936 6y ago
      Interestingly, a lot has changed in computers in the past 33 years. When gif was made there were no good lossy compression algorithms that had been developed, let alone implemented efficiently enough to run on computers of the day. This changed by the early 90s. >he’s saying that videos are solving the problems of over sized gifs And they have been for the past 25 years.

egfx 7y ago

> If you can represent 16 million colors in video, then you can make a video that only uses a subset of those 256 colors (exactly what gif does). If you need the high frequency information then you can tune the encoder and still get a filesize that is an order of magnitude smaller than gif. and that's like fitting a square peg into a round hole. If you downscale to a gif you get the graphical effects for free. https://i.imgur.com/8LdcFn5.gif https://i.imgur.com/8LdcFn5.gif

Dylan16807 6y ago
Downscaling to get a limiting effect 'for free' is not 'high art'. https://twitter.com/cyangmou/status/1254089487870722048 https://twitter.com/cyangmou/status/1254089487870722048 Pixel art is an art form, but you have to deliberately design around the medium. And there are other ways to deliberately design something to fit the gif format. But someone converting a generic animation or video to gif is not gaining anything.
- egfx 6y ago
  Much of what art is, is serendipity, accident and discovery. If you’re overly deliberate your not creating high art. Anyway I just find it funny that gifs were invented to solve the problem of over sized video and now he’s saying that videos are solving the problems of over sized gifs.
  - Dylan16807 6y ago
    The format was designed so you could do simple animation in a way that otherwise acts like an image format. For actual video style content, it never saved space. And codecs for video have massively improved over the years, while gif hasn't.
  - willis936 6y ago
    Interestingly, a lot has changed in computers in the past 33 years. When gif was made there were no good lossy compression algorithms that had been developed, let alone implemented efficiently enough to run on computers of the day. This changed by the early 90s. >he’s saying that videos are solving the problems of over sized gifs And they have been for the past 25 years.