3 ms·
> The true opposite would be "industry has to fend for itself without being able to co-opt government to tilt the playing field in its favor". Sure, good point
by leto_ii 6y ago
> The true opposite would be "industry has to fend for itself without being able to co-opt government to tilt the playing field in its favor".
Sure, good point. However I don't think it's possible or desirable to let industry be completely independent of the state. It seems to me that would lead us right back to our current predicament - power would concentrate and it would start putting pressure on the state.
- pdonis 6y ago> power would concentrate and it would start putting pressure on the state The state itself is a concentration of power. Industry wants to co-opt it for that very reason.
- leto_ii 6y agoNot saying that the state is a good thing. It's slightly better than a corporation though, because it's under some sort of democratic control. Ideally though, all concentrations of power should be dismantled.
- disgruntledphd2 6y agoI'm not sure that's realistic, with respect to concentrations of power. Whatever power you use to reduce concentrations of power would undoubtedly become quite powerful. I think that it's probably better to attempt to reduce the size of any one concentration of power, and set them all up watching each other.
- leto_ii 6y ago> it's probably better to attempt to reduce the size of any one concentration of power Agreed. It would be great if power was as decentralised as possible and if individuals would take an active part in their (self-)government.