4 ms·
It might be difficult to impossible to currently implement, but perhaps if you have access to :///* you should lose access to pretty much every other permission
by csours 6y ago
It might be difficult to impossible to currently implement, but perhaps if you have access to :///* you should lose access to pretty much every other permission.
- oefrha 6y agoThat’s not how permissions work in Chrome extensions. You pretty much can’t do anything with the URL matching permission alone, however broad your pattern (including <all_urls>). Take a look at https://developer.chrome.com/apps/declare_permissions https://developer.chrome.com/apps/declare_permissions https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/api_index https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/api_index Edit: I should mention that content script permissions declaration works differently: https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/content_scripts https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/content_scripts
- iudqnolq 6y agoThat wouldn't help much. For example, with read/write access to your banking website a malicious extension could inject a script tag that exfiltrated data to their server.
- csours 6y agoI know, that's why I say it's difficult to impossible to implement at the current time. I do think it is an interesting goal.