3 ms·
It's not obvious that this well help anything, but at least it's better than Jersey City. They put a cap on how much apps can charge restaurants, so obviously t
by badfrog 6y ago
It's not obvious that this well help anything, but at least it's better than Jersey City. They put a cap on how much apps can charge restaurants, so obviously the apps just added more fees for the customer.
https://www.nj.com/hudson/2020/05/uber-eats-slaps-surcharge-on-customers-of-jersey-city-eateries-in-response-to-10-commission-cap.html https://www.nj.com/hudson/2020/05/uber-eats-slaps-surcharge-...
- creddit 6y agoSF did this as well.
- bogomipz 6y agoNYC put forth legislation today to cap at 20%: https://ny.eater.com/2020/5/12/21256244/food-delivery-fee-cap-legislation-nyc https://ny.eater.com/2020/5/12/21256244/food-delivery-fee-ca...
- JAlexoid 6y agoAnd what is that going to achieve?
- Dylan16807 6y agoMaking the customers aware of how much they're paying in fees is a good thing. Now delivery services have to compete directly on the fee they charge customers. Before, the customer had no idea if one service was charging a restaurant 20% and another was charging 30%, which is effectively one service subsidizing another.