2 ms·
Yes, obviously, stock markets are essential and efficient capital allocators, in aggregate. Perhaps I shouldn't have simplified. But a single retiree's $500k pu
by listenallyall 7y ago
Yes, obviously, stock markets are essential and efficient capital allocators, in aggregate. Perhaps I shouldn't have simplified. But a single retiree's $500k purchase of some megacorp's stock will have effectively zero impact, like a drop in the ocean. As you say, it's up to someone "eventually down the chain" to actually deploy the capital. Investing in an index fund adds even more layers. In contrast, a community bank deposit will get multiplied and quickly deployed directly to local businesses or homeowners.
The point being, `eanzenberg`'s idea that money in a savings account just sits there idly doing nothing, is false.
- chii 7y agoi would argue that money invested in stock market has an even higher investment velocity than a bank deposit. after all, a bank cannot invest in risky assets. "eventually down the chain [of stock investments]" is very fast in terms of timing, and i guarantee you it is faster than a bank's loan process for small businesses.