3 ms·
Rather than arguing why we "fail to understand", you should consider reading some/all of the links I provided to find out why the research supports our position
by timr 7y ago
Rather than arguing why we "fail to understand", you should consider reading some/all of the links I provided to find out why the research supports our position.
- eveningcoffee 7y agoI have reviewed it and most of it is questionable. The level of research is - we do not know - more research is needed. Btw. did you realize that the second link you provide supports the opposite conclusion?
- timr 7y agoIt does not: "On this occasion, we believe public-facing communications regarding the scientific view on the balance of risks and benefits of widespread uptake of face masks have exceeded the scientific evidence base. Efforts to communicate a position so strongly in favour of widespread use of masks in the community, against current WHO advice and in the face of persistent evidence gaps and debates, risk promoting policy that is based more on eminence—the track record, credentials and status of the authors—than on evidence."
- eveningcoffee 7y agoIe. more evidence is needed. Weak. Rest of the discussion actually supports usage of masks.