4 ms·
> It's probably cost them a lot of lives Who's measuring the cost of lock-down? I think it's going to show to be very costly (perhaps net-negative) as time goe
by gnusty_gnurc 6y ago
> It's probably cost them a lot of lives
Who's measuring the cost of lock-down? I think it's going to show to be very costly (perhaps net-negative) as time goes on. Cancer, heart attacks, strokes, deaths of despair, economic disruption, etc.
- rumanator 6y agoI honestly have no idea how you are able to reason an idea that a full blown epidemic does not disturb a national health service. Moreover, it seems you're entirely oblivious to the fact that covid19 infections are known to trigger cardiac and renal and even neurological problems. Thus if you were honestly concerned about heart attacks and strokes and other conditions then you most certainly wouldn't be putting up lame strawmen like those. And God forbid that a nation needs to spend the citizen's resources caring for the best interests of said citizens.
- SpicyLemonZest 6y agoI don't really follow your response here. The idea that lockdowns have serious costs is not a "strawman" and doesn't imply other options have no costs.