5 ms·
I feel that this is a violation of trust. A lot of users are there to talk to another person, they're not necessarily ready or willing to be shirtless in front
by zankly 6y ago
I feel that this is a violation of trust. A lot of users are there to talk to another person, they're not necessarily ready or willing to be shirtless in front of tens of thousands of people. If I was on a jury and there was a lawsuit, I would award damages.
- electricviolet 6y agoThis is why we can't have nice things :(
- domador 6y agoIsn't showing up shirtless to a video chat with a stranger a huge violation of trust in itself? I'd be much more inclined to consider "shirtlessness" (to give this phenomenon a short name) to be a sign of aggression, rather than of innocence and of trust in others.
- lopmotr 6y agoThey're clearly OK with exposing themselves to strangers because that's the reason they're doing it. How does the number of strangers matter? If they were shy, they could have put their shirt on before going out in public.
- ubercow13 6y agoWhat would the lawsuit be for?
- stale2002 6y agoThe other stranger did not consent to being situation where the rando was shirtless, though. Them being shirtless without telling the other person in advance, is harm that theyd be causing in the first place.
- birdyrooster 6y agoSo if you flash me on the subway and I take a photo of it to share... I am violating your trust?!