3 ms·
I feel like that's an important distinction. In Canada, our officials said in January that asymptomatic individuals were not main drivers of epidemics. And wh
by colmvp 6y ago
I feel like that's an important distinction.
In Canada, our officials said in January that asymptomatic individuals were not main drivers of epidemics.
And while that may have been true with something like influenza, a more accurate statement would've been we don't have evidence _yet_ that suggests asymptomatic individuals could effectively spread the virus.
We proceeded to operate on that assumption by not forcing incoming travelers from infected regions to isolate, unless they contacted health officials with symptoms associated to the virus. We didn't change this stance until late March, well after the virus had infected thousands of people across the country.
In contrast, Taiwan implemented mandatory 14-day self-isolations for incoming travelers from specific regions as early as late January.
In Ontario, we've had cases of airport taxi drivers pass away from Covid-19. Whereas Taiwan recognized that there'd likely be a large number of people coming home with the virus, so they created special airport quarantine taxis equipped with mandatory masks for passengers and isopropyl alcohol for the driver.
- pbhjpbhj 6y agoWorth noting how some people, including mainstream press, have vilified WHO for saying there was "no evidence yet of human-human transmission" (at the point there was no evidence yet), and for saying (paraphrasing) "it's not a pandemic yet, not until there's community spread across global regions" when it wasn't yet a pandemic. So, yes, I'd agree with your 3rd para, but press can spin such statements to create reputational damage which is really underserved.