3 ms·
It's a negative result. What isn't there matters - in particular, no info on there being some form of monetary ROI. I don't have other sources at hand - just m
by radu_floricica 6y ago
It's a negative result. What isn't there matters - in particular, no info on there being some form of monetary ROI.
I don't have other sources at hand - just memories from when the study was published and there was quite a lot of discussion.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- marcosdumay 6y agoHum... I've searched the study, and it looks like results are still scheduled to be published this year. Granted that it was a quick search, but I get no source for the claim that the result was negative. Besides, UBI being cheaper to administer than current social security, failure in finding any difference is a reason to adopt it, not to keep the status quo.
- radu_floricica 6y agoUBI is definitely not cheaper that current social security. "To administer" maybe, but the total cost is probably orders of magnitude more, and doesn't even solve the problem: certain demographics will still need extra.
- marcosdumay 6y ago> UBI is definitely not cheaper that current social security. If you count taxing a person to give the money back to the same person as a cost, it's certainly not.