I'm sorry, but it's simply not possible to square your comments with the content as presented. Let me quote it directly, in case you missed it: > Studies prov

I'm sorry, but it's simply not possible to square your comments with the content as presented. Let me quote it directly, in case you missed it: > Studies proving the virus was not "engineered" do not prove the spillover event occured outside of a laboratory. We are not claiming the virus was engineered. They also do not prove that the spillover event did not involve an animal or organism sourced from one of these labs. > To start with, we will once again state that we are not claiming SARS-CoV-2 has been engineered. > Editors’ note, March 2020: We are aware that this story is being used as the basis for unverified theories that the novel coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that this is true; scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus. I'd like to engage on this, but it's pretty clear you aren't discussing this in good faith, or even reading the content you're talking about, so I'm going to have to step out.