3 ms·
If you expect WSJ to not be in favor of hardcore right wing / business interest, then honestly its a lack of perception. They've had that reputation for years.
by ikiris 6y ago
If you expect WSJ to not be in favor of hardcore right wing / business interest, then honestly its a lack of perception. They've had that reputation for years. You might consider taking this as an opportunity to reexamine where you believe level-headed and balanced lie in light of this example that you're familiar enough with to see the very large problems in their arguments and general position.
- dannyw 6y agoAbsolutely. The general quality and of course objectivity of WSJ has gone downhill for years. It’s not a recent phenomenon.
- souterrain 6y agoIn this case though, one would assume zero objectivity from any paper. The piece referenced is editorial.
- paulgb 6y agoKind of a lazy one, though. And I say this as a WSJ subscriber who regularly finds the editorials worth reading even when I disagree with them. In this case, it's just knee-jerk anti-anti-capitalism without bothering to understand the nuances of the situation.
- sqldba 6y agoWould you say Washington Post is more balanced or about the same?